On June 22, 1941 the Dictator of Nazi
Germany, Adolf Hitler turned the attention of his nation’s war efforts to the east;
towards the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. That day 3,300,000 German soldiers
embarked upon one of history’s most ambitious military campaigns by invading the Soviet
Union and creating the infamous “Eastern Front”. As mentioned in many of Adolf Hitler’s
speeches, the Soviet Union contained more living space for the German people. More
important to the German war machine and Hitler however, was the fact that the Soviet Union
contained a seemingly endless supply of grain and oil. If these resources were ever at
Hitler’s disposal, he would have the ability to wage war indefinitely. This was something
both the Soviet Union and Great Britain could ill afford. As a result of the German
invasion, overwhelming numbers of Soviet soldiers and massive amounts of Soviet equipment
were captured within the opening months of the campaign. The Soviets were hard pressed to
slow the German advance as it blitzed across the open plains of Eastern Europe. For the
most part, they had the greater weight of the German Army driving towards Moscow slowed
more by logistical constraints than by Soviet resistance. By 1942, the Soviets urgently
pleaded with the Western Allies (Great Britain and the Commonwealth since September of 1939
and the United States as of December 1941) to open up a second front in Europe in order to
alleviate some of this pressure from the Germans. The Western Allies feared that if the
Soviet Union continued to be burdened with the better part of the German Army knocking at
its door, that the Soviets might capitulate and negotiate a separate peace in the East.
The prospect of a separate peace was horrifying for the Western Allies. If such a agreement
ever took place, the Western Allies feared that they would be incapable of having the
ability to deal with the Germany Army once it had incorporated it’s troop strength from
the Eastern Front into its Western Defences and North Africa. The recent memory of Russia’s
concessions in the Brest-Litovsk treaty of 1917-18 had the Western Allies worried that a
separate peace in the east was a very real possibility. The Western Allies knew that they
did not have the resources to open any meaningful Western Front to help the Soviet Union’s
dilemma. However, they could not let it appear to the Soviet Union’s leader, Joseph Stalin,
that they were not doing anything to draw German strength from the Eastern Front.
The response from the Western Allies
was to create some diversions in order to convince Stalin that they were indeed doing
something to bleed German troop strength. Chief among these diversions was “Operation
Jubilee”, better known as the Battle for Dieppe.
As a member of the British Commonwealth,
Canada had declared war on Germany a week after England had, in September of 1939. The
Royal Canadian Navy and the Royal Canadian Air Force were principally the first of Canada’s
combatants to see action against the enemy, although some of Canada’s ground forces did
land briefly in France in 1940, only to be evacuated almost as soon as they had disembarked
. The Canadian Army’s first European land battle would be during Operation Jubilee. Jubilee
was designed as a raid of the French coastal town Dieppe, which would take place in August
of 1942. The fiasco at Dieppe was a large-scale raid utilizing mostly Canadian troops from
the 2nd Canadian Infantry Division.1 It also included 50 American Rangers and both 3 and 4
Commando from the British. Collectively these elements were to be supported by the Royal
Navy and the Royal Air Force who had allocated a total of 237 ships and almost 1,000
fighter and bomber aircraft. The raid was a military disaster insofar as achieving any of
its tactical objectives. However, it would render a wealth of intelligence information. The
Battle for Dieppe would cost the Canadians 3,379 men killed, captured and missing. Of these
, nearly 1,000 were killed outright on the beaches. The British lost 347 men from both the
Commandos and the Royal Marines while the Royal Navy lost an additional 550 men. The
American Rangers lost 8 men (killed and captured) while the combined Royal and Royal
Canadian Air Forces lost 122 aircraft. When all was said and done it was a stiff price to
pay in order to “learn” about the Atlantic Wall’s defences. This is especially apparent in
retrospect when one considers the comparatively light German losses. The Germans had lost
597 (killed or wounded) collectively from the German Army, Navy and Air Force. However,
this expensive knowledge did prove invaluable for the Western Allies when they launched
their amphibious assault on the Normandy coastline on the 6th of June 1944 This of course,
would latter become known as D-Day.
What the allies learned from Dieppe was
simple, but vital for the later success of D-Day. The allies learned that ports were far
too heavily defended and would have to be avoided. This in turn would then necessitate
that the allies to provide themselves with their own artificial harbours. Necessity being
the mother of invention, saw the advent of the “Mulberry”. The Mulberry was a prefabricated
floating concrete box, which when linked to other Mulberry sections, formed an artificial
harbour. Mulberry harbours were indispensable in bringing more troops and supplies ashore
to the beachhead after D-Day.
The allies also discovered that
specialty tanks would be needed to perform a variety of tasks ranging from mine clearance,
to swimming tanks, which could swim in with the troops during the beach assault.
Speciality tanks would also include bridge-laying variants, which could span ditches or
walls and bunker busters, which could destroy hardened enemy positions. These tanks were
casually referred to as “Funnies” as most of them looked strange (or funny) in some way.
The Americans perceived them as having dubious value because of their awkward appearances
and the fact that they had not proven themselves in battle. The necessity for speciality
vehicles learned at Dieppe was not as clear to some as it was to others, but as results
would indicate on the British and Canadian D-Day beaches, they were instrumental in the
success of the commonwealth landings.
In conjunction with this, the Allies
also found that there was a need for more accurate and meticulous intelligence about the
proposed invasion beaches themselves. The difference of whether a sea wall was 3 or 7 feet
tall made a big difference to the troops and tanks that were tasked to get over it. The
number of guns and their locations was also of extreme importance. The French Resistance
and many clandestine units like the British Special Boat Service regularly scoured the
coastline for this type of detailed information. Valuable intelligence ranged from the
composition of the actual beach itself to the number, type and position of underwater
obstacles as well as the location and disposition of enemy defensive positions. Part of the
problem at Dieppe was that tanks had trouble traversing the loose shingle like rocks on the
beach, at times getting themselves hung up, and this was without any obstacles in the surf.
Compounding this problem there were a number of hidden anti-tank gun and machine gun
positions which swept the beach with fire. Knowing these types of things in advance would
help the Allies find beaches, which were better suited for landings.
As part of the effort to acquire more
intelligence on the enemy held shores, a plan dating back to 1943, requested the British
public to submit any pre-war pictures they had of the continental coastline. This type of
intelligence would provide the allies with all sorts of details for certain parts of the
occupied coast. As a result, a whole new area of study was created. This was of course
photographic interpretation. This new area of study would shed light on a variety of
crucial details about the occupied coastline.
The Allies also discovered that if they
wanted to even scratch the German defences in any preliminary bombardments they would need
to use larger calibre guns and bombs and more of them. This also saw the advent of special
bombardment vessels and the realization that damaging the enemy’s defences as much as
possible before the assault went in was crucial to the success of the operation.
With all of these lessons either freshly
learned or re-emphasised, the Allies set about planning the details of Operation
“Overlord”. Overlord was a design to invade occupied Europe, gain a foothold on the
continent and then consolidate that foothold. This foothold would then in turn provide the
Western Allies with a jumping off point with which they could later push the Germans back.
D-Day, as it is commonly known was the day in which the Western allies invaded and successfully
breeched Adolf Hitler’s “Fortress Europe”. It was essentially the focal point of Operation
Overlord. Fortress Europe was protected by a seemingly insurmountable string of defences known
as “The Atlantic Wall”. The Atlantic Wall, consisted specifically of well dug in, well prepared
and well hidden static defences, which covered the coastline of Occupied France, Belgium,
Holland, Denmark and Norway. It spanned from the Bay of Biscay to the Artic Ocean covering some
2,400 miles.2 The defences themselves ranged from coastal guns to sandbagged machine
gun nests. The Atlantic Wall was designed to fend off an invasion, sinking invasion ships and
destroying any tanks or infantry that might have made it ashore. It also had its own
anti-aircraft ability in addition to a few well-protected submarine pens. Camouflage, obstacles,
interlocking fields of fire, observation posts, good communications and the ability to contend
with airborne, sea borne and landed ground targets collectively made the Atlantic Wall the
biggest defensive barrier the Allies ever had to contend with throughout the course of the
Second World War.
The invasion plan itself outlined five
assault areas, which were located along the coastline of occupied France. Specifically, they
were located within the area of France known as Normandy. (See Figure #1) Of
these five beachheads, two were American, two were British and one was Canadian. The American
beaches were referred to as Utah and Omaha, while the British beaches were called Gold and Sword
. The Canadian beach would be known as Juno. All together, these beachheads would form a
continuous lodgement once they became connected inland. This lodgement was the very jumping off
point that Overlord sought to create. The Allied force tasked to assault the Normandy coast was
21 Army Group under the Command of British General Montgomery.3 The United States First Army,
also under General Montgomery’s command, consisted of the U.S. 7th Corps tasked to Utah beach as
well as the U.S. 5th Corps tasked to Omaha. In addition Montgomery also had the British Second
Army, which contained the British 30th Corps allocated to Gold Beach. Montgomery also had the
British First Corps, which saw the Canadian 3rd Infantry Division tasked to Juno Beach and the
British 3rd Infantry Division tasked to Sword.
The Canadians at Juno beach were located
between the two British beaches, Gold and Sword. The Juno beachhead spanned from the Norman
hamlet of Vaux to the town of St.Aubin-sur-mer. The Canadian objectives consisted of three
phase lines as the assault pressed inland. The first two phase lines were “Yew” and “Elm”. The
last phase line was called “Oak”, and it was located just past the Caen-Bayeaux highway. Phase
Line Oak would be reached by June 7th. This is worth mentioning, as the Canadian 3rd Infantry
Division would be the first out of the entire 21st Army Group to reach its D-Day objectives.4
The assaults on all of the allied beachheads
were to begin early in the morning on June the 6th 1944. The invasion of all of the intended
beachheads were to be preceded by bombing and shelling by the respective allied air forces and
navies just prior to the actual beach assaults. In addition, the Allies had also dropped
airborne formations into Normandy to secure important bridges, cut off enemy communications and
reinforcements as well as generally adding to the enemy’s state of confusion.
At Juno Beach, H-Hour (the start time) for
operations, was originally at 0735hrs, but was moved up to 0745hrs because overall the Juno
landings were not collectively going as fast as they had originally been hoped for.5 H-Hour, was
set forty four minutes before sunrise. At that time, a massive fireplan was to go into effect
followed by the beach assault. Since the evening of June 5th, heavy bombers from the United
States Eighth Air Force had been pounding Omaha, Sword, Gold and Juno beaches, tapering off just
as H-Hour set in. (Utah Beach was taken care of by the U.S. 9th Airforce). Unfortunately at Juno
, many of the bombs dropped past their targets. This was largely due to the fact that the
bombardiers who had aimed them were using instruments to aim as opposed to sight because of the
overcast weather. They plotted enough leeway so as not to drop their payloads on the incoming
landing craft, but as it turned out they had overcorrected. As a result, hardly any of the
fortifications were damaged or inoperable. As for the Navy, Destroyers were to open up on shore
targets from H minus 45 (45 minutes before H-Hour) and follow up until the first landing craft
hit the beach. 20 Batteries from the larger ships were to commence at H minus 30. Four regiments
of Self-Propelled Artillery consisting of 24 105mm guns (which were still aboard landing ships),
were also to open fire for the same timing. Lastly, the Landing Craft Tank (rocket) were to
engage targets from H minus 10 to H minus 5.
While Juno Beach was pounded, the 3rd
Canadian Infantry Division moved ashore in a variety of landing craft. The Canadian 7th and 8th
Infantry Brigades were to assault the beach and the 9th Infantry Brigade was in reserve. The 7th
Infantry Brigade consisted of the Royal Winnipeg Rifle Infantry Regiment, the Royal Regina Rifle
Infantry Regiment and one company of the Canadian Scottish Infantry Regiment, (“C” Coy). The
rest of the Canadian Scottish constituted the 7th Infantry Brigades reserve. Supporting the 7th
Infantry Brigade was the 6th Armoured Regiment - the 1st Hussars.6 As for the 8th Infantry
Brigade, it was comprised of the Queens Own Rifles of Canada [Infantry] and the North Shore
(New Brunswick) Infantry Regiment. They were to be supported by the 10th Armoured Regiment - The
Fort Garry Horse. The 8th Brigade’s reserve was the Regiment de la Chaudiere.7 In overall
reserve of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division was the 9th Infantry Brigade. The reserve infantry
brigade was made up of the North Nova Scotia Highlanders Infantry Regiment, the Stormont,
Dundas and Glengarry Highlander Infantry Regiment and the Highland Infantry of Canada Regiment.
In support of the 9th Infantry Brigade was the 27th Armoured Regiment - The Sherbrooke Fusiliers.8
In overall support of the assault elements, were
a handful of specialty units employed for clearing mines, pillboxes and other obstacles.9 These
included AVREs (Assault Vehicle Royal Engineers) from the 5th Assault Regiment Royal Engineers and a
handful of other tanks and bulldozers from the 2nd Royal Marine Armoured Support Regiment. Amongst
these, were Centaur Tanks, whose 95mm Howitzers would be used to destroy enemy gun placements and
fortifications at point blank range. Added to this was the support of the 12th, 13th, 14th and 19th
Field Artillery Regiments of the Royal Canadian Artillery. Lastly were two squadrons of DD
(Duplex Drive - swimming tanks) allotted to each Brigade sector.
As seen on Figure #2,
facing inland from right to left of the 7th Infantry Brigade consisted of “C” Coy of the Canadian
Scottish Regiment, and the Royal Winnipeg Rifles Regiment with “A” Squadron of the 1st Hussars in
support. These would land on “Mike” beach - sector “Green” and sector “Red”. Next were the Royal
Regina Rifles who had “B” Squadron of the 1st Hussars in support. Both of these units would land on
“Nan” beach - sector “Green”.10
Next to the 7th Infantry Brigade was the 8th
Infantry Brigade, who landed the Queens Own Rifles of Canada on “Nan” beach - sector “White” with
“B” Squadron of the Fort Garry Horse in support. Following them, were the North Shore (New Brunswick)
Regiment who would land on “Nan” beach - sector “Red”. They in turn, were supported by “A” Squadron
of the Fort Garry Horse Armoured Regiment.11
Opposing the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division’s
assault at Juno Beach, was the German 716th Infantry Division. The 716th was a static formation,
meaning it was designated to hold largely immobile positions and weapons to defend the coast. All
ranks added up to some 7,771 men, roughly half of the number of Canadians that would land within
their area of operations.12 It contained two Infantry Regiments, the 726th and the 736th. The 716th
Infantry Division also had several elements of the 21st Panzer Division in its operating area and
under its command (two Panzer Grenadier Battalions and the Divisional Anti-Tank Battalion).13
In support of the German 716th Infantry Division, were three battalions of divisional artillery,
which was made up of a mixture of guns captured from the French, Poles, Czechs and Russians. From
its Heavy Battalion of Artillery, only one Battery of Guns was of a “larger” 155mm calibre. The
716th Infantry Division also had access to some of the 21st Panzer Division’s Guns, which added up
to another three batteries, but these were mobile and mostly of 105mm calibre. The 716th Infantry
Division had relatively no armour to speak of and all of the armoured elements of the 21st Panzer
Division were north of the French City of Caen. The beach defences themselves were not quite so
regimented in their organization. Instead, beach defences largely added up to a numerous series of
resistance nests interspersed with more organised elements of the 716th. Collectively, these
defences composed of a wide variety of weapons from machine guns and anti-tank guns to coastal
batteries. While the bulk of the defences were sighted seaward and able to support the beaches
themselves, there were also numerous guns and defensive positions sighted more inland to stop a
breakthrough. The coastal area defended by the 716th was also heavily sewn with mines of all types
as well as a variety of obstacles, many of which had to be contended with right on the beaches
themselves. However, most of these assets were mobile and could be sent elsewhere if needed. The
troops of the 716th themselves, were considered by their overall army Group commander
(Field Marshal General Gerd Von Rundstedt), to be a “better than average static
division…[and]…completely fit for defence”.14 It should be noted however, that while
other allied beaches were defended by higher quality troops (like those of the German 352nd Infantry
Division), the 716th was by no means a token formation. In addition to the “better than average”
troops of the 716th, the defences that they manned, would also prove to be very well constructed, in
addition to being well sighted and in some cases well camouflaged.15 Routing the German
716th Infantry Division out of its defences was no easy task, and as history would prove, the men of
the 716th would make a good account of themselves on D-Day being responsible for some 961 Canadian,
and 243 British casualties on Juno Beach.16 This was the second highest number of allied
(beachhead) casualties on D-Day next only to the 2,200 men killed at the Omaha Beachhead. To put this
into perspective, the British took 413 casualties at Gold Beach, 630 at Sword and 800 in their
airborne drops while the Americans took 197 casualties at Utah and another 2,500 for their combined
airborne drops from both the 82nd and 101st Airborne Divisions. Collectively, there were about 8,500
allied casualties on D-Day alone. Alternately, the Germans have no specific numbers of casualties for
the 716th infantry division on D-Day, other than to indicate that 80% of their infantry strength was
lost on June 6th 1944. This left the 716th with one battalion of infantry, which had already taken
20% casualties and only 20% of its original artillery complement. By the 9th of June, only 292 men of
all ranks from the 716th were to be counted.17
The evening of June 6th 1944 marks the decisive
turning point, which drew the European Theatre of World War Two to a conclusion. Across the coast of
Normandy the respective allied beachheads began to link up to form one continuous lodgement. It is
from here that the Allies consolidated their toehold and began preparations to push the Germans back.
This push began in the days that followed D-Day and ended on May 4th 1945 with the unconditional
surrender of Nazi Germany to the Allies.
D-Day was crucial for the allied success in the
European theatre of Operations. From their lodgement in Normandy, the Western Allies would press
inland, slowly pushing the Germans back up against the oncoming Soviet Red Army. Canada’s involvement
on D-Day and the Normandy Campaign while frequently played down or outright forgotten about, played
no small role in the success of Operation Overlord. At places like Dieppe, Canada had paid the price
for many of the lessons learned, which proved indispensable to the success of D-Day. Moreover,
Canada’s contributions from D-Day and its drive inland were just as noteworthy, but that is material
for a different discussion.
End notes
1)All casualty figures for the Battle of Dieppe were taken from Hogg, Ian V. Great Land Battles of World War II (New York:Double Day Inc., 1987):80,81.
2)Botting, Douglas Time Life Books: World War Two: The Second Front (New Jersey:Time Life Books Inc., 1978):8.
3)Chain of Command for Allied 21 Army Group (June 6, 1944) taken form Tute, Warren D Day (London:Nautic Presentations Ltd., 1974):1, 57-59.
4) Stacey, Col. C.P. Official History of The Canadian Army Volume III: The Operations in North West Europe 1944-1945 (Ottawa:Queens Printer and Controller of Stationary, 1966):126.
5)All statistics on preliminary bombardment of D-Day Beaches and Fireplans taken from Ibid., 90-100.
6)All information regarding the composition of the 7th Infantry Brigade (3rd Canadian Infantry Division, June 6, 1944) were taken from Ibid., 102-107, Map 2.
7)All information regarding the composition of the 8th Infantry Brigade (3rd Canadian Infantry Division, June 6, 1944) were taken from Ibid., 107-110, Map 2.
8)All information regarding the composition of the 9th Infantry Brigade (3rd Canadian Infantry Division, June 6, 1944) were taken from Ibid., 110-113, Map 2.
9)All information regarding the composition of supporting elements of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division on D-Day, June 6, 1944 were taken from Ibid., 102.
10)All information and statistics regarding the assault elements of the 7th Infantry Brigade (3rd Canadian Infantry Division, June 6, 1944) on Juno Beach, Beaches “Mike”, sectors “Green“ and “Red” and “Nan” Beach, sector “Green” (D-Day) were taken from Ibid., 102-107.
11)All information and statistics regarding the assault elements of the 8th Infantry Brigade (3rd Canadian Infantry Division, June 6, 1944)on Juno Beach, “Nan” Beach, sectors “White” and “Red” (D-Day) were taken from Ibid., 107-110.
12)Strength of the German 716th Infantry Division (Static) Seventh Army, Army Group “B”
as Compared to Strength of the 3rd Canadian Infantry Division taken from Ibid., 66, 119
13)Order of Battle and disposition of the German 716th Infantry Division Seventh Army, Army Group “B” and its defences Ibid., 66-70, Map 1.
14)Ibid., 67
15)All information on the locations types, dispositions and numbers of specific defences manned or operated by the German 716th Infantry Division, Seventh Army, Army Group “B” taken from Ibid., 65-70, Map 1.
16)All information concerning all allied casualties suffered by 21 Army group on June 6, 1944 taken from Ibid., 651 (Appendix “C”)
17)Ibid., 124
Bibliography
Books
Botting, Douglas, Time Life Books:World War II:The Second Front, New Jersey:Time Life Books Inc. (1978)
Granastein, J.L., Morton, Desmond, A Nation Forged In Fire: Canadians and the Second World War 1939-45, Toronto:Lester and Orpen Dennys Ltd. (1989)
Granastein, J.L., Morton, Desmond, Bloody Victory:Canadians and the D-Day Campaign 1944, Toronto:Lester and Dennys Ltd. (1984)
Hogg, Ian V. Great Land Battles of World War II, New York:Doubleday and Co. (1887)
Stacey, Col.C.P., Official History of the Canadian Army In the Second World War:Volume III The Victory Campaign: The Operations in North-West Europe 1944-1945, Ottawa:Queens Printer and Controller of Stationary (1966)
Tute, Warren and Editors, D Day, London:Nautic Presentations Ltd. (1974)
Pictures
Figure #1; replica.eb.mirror-image.com/normandy/maps/onormay030m4.html
Figure #2; www.valourandhorror.com/DB/MAP/mp_dday.htm
Author’s Note
This article is for the most part based off of the information from Colonel C.P.
Stacey’s edition for “Volume III of the Official History Of The Canadian Army:
The Victory Campaign: The Operations in North-West Europe 1944-1945”, as it is the single
most accurate and comprehensive piece written about Canadian Participation on D-Day.
As such, it offers the best collection of detailed information and statistics encompassing
all aspects of Canadian Participation on D-Day. I feel the need to point this out as I
regret having to draw upon one source so heavily.
Sincerely, Brian Fotheringham