|
News
|
Section Leaders:
Reviewed By: Maastrictian The views and opinions expressed here don't necessarily reflect those of the staff and management of CMHQ, they might, but we would never say that in public!
Statler:
That [scenario] scared the pants off me! Waldorf:
Are you sure you didn’t just forget to put them on again? These
reviews have three purposes. The
first purpose is the help scenario designers by seeing what works and
what doesn’t. My
critiques are meant to highlight weaknesses in the game and help the
designer correct them. Also,
designers, by seeing where others went wrong, will hopefully avoid
their predecessors mistakes. The
second purpose is to promote discussion of who liked what scenario and
why. I am not the only
person who holds opinions about scenarios and it would benefit everyone
to hear as many voices as possible.
Far too many of the combathq scenarios are stuck at a
meaningless three stars. So
post on battlefront to discuss what you liked and didn’t! The
third purpose is to help people decide what scenarios to play.
No one can play them all so it would be nice to only play the
best of the best. To aid
this process I rate all the scenarios I play according to the following
scale:
See
point two if you disagree with my ratings. Now on to the reviews:
|
||||||||
